• Kentucky Compliance Record Review Form 2013-2014

  •  - -
    • Document 
    • Image-401
  • Confidentiality of Information

  • The name of the party seeking access;

  • The date access was given; AND

  • The purpose for which the party is authorized to use the record(s).

    • Document 
    • Image-414
  • Notice of Invitation

  • The LEA provides a written invitation to the parent(s) at least

    seven (7) calendar days before an ARC meeting.

    NOTE: This also applies to initial ARC meetings for preschoolers transitioning from First Steps.

  • There is documentation of the district’s attempts to arrange a mutually agreed-on time and place.

  • The purpose of the meeting;

  • For children who are in 8th grade or age 14 and older,

    the purpose of the meeting indicates the ARC discussion

    of postsecondary needs and/or services;

  •  The time of the meeting;

  • The date of the meeting;

  •  The location of the meeting;

  • The role of participants attending the meeting


  •  An option for the parent(s) to note the need for alternative meeting times,

    dates, locations, and means of participation;

  •  A statement informing the parent(s) they may bring

    persons to assist them in the meeting;

  • For children transitioning from First Steps, an invitation to the initial  ARC meeting

    is sent to the First Steps Service Coordinator or other representatives of the Part C

    system if the parent requests.

  •   For children who are in 8th  grade or age 14 and older: the child is invited to the meeting.

    • Document 
    • Image-415
  • ARC Membership

  • Parent (in attendance) OR  

    In cases where the parent did not attend,

    documentation shows that all of the following occurred:  

    Parents received written notification of the meeting;

      Parents were offered alternative meeting time and location;

    Parents were given the opportunity for alternate means of participation

      (e.g., informal conference, phone conference, ARC conference call, e-mail,

       homevisit, survey);

    and, Parents were sent a copy of the IEP and ARC Conference Summary

      (as indicated on ARC Conference Summary by method and date).

  • A regular education teacher of the child; 

  • A special education teacher of the child OR a special education teacher 

    knowledgeable of the suspected disability;
  • A representative of the school district, qualified to provide, or supervise the

    provision of specially designed instruction, knowledgeable of the curriculum and

    district resources; 

  • An individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation 

    results who may be a member of the team described in 16-18; 

  • Related services personnel, as appropriate; 

  • For children who are in 8th grade or age 14 and older, the child is

    involved in the ARC process relative to transition planning. 

    OR 

    In cases where the child did not attend, documentation shows that all of the

    following occurred: 

    The child was invited to the meeting; AND,

    Other steps are taken to ensure that the child’s preferences and

    interests are considered.

  • If a member of the ARC is excused from attending the ARC meeting in

    whole or in part, the parent and the district agree to the excusal in writing

    prior to the meeting. 

  • If a member of the ARC is excused, the member must submit input into the

    development of the IEP in writing to the parent(s) and the ARC, if the

    member’s area of curriculum or related service is to be modified or

    discussed in the meeting.  Input must be submitted prior to the meeting. 

    • Document 
  • Notice of Action

  • A description of each evaluation procedure test, record, or report used as a basis

    for proposed or refused action; 

    boxes are checked for each evaluation procedure, test, record or report

    the district used as a basis for the proposed or refused action 

    AND 

    a description of assessment instruments and procedures included.

  • A description of the action proposed or refused; 

  • An explanation of why the LEA proposed/refuses to take action;

  • A description of any other options and reasons those options were rejected;

  • A description of any other factors related to the LEA’s proposal or refusal; 

    (Look at Section VI of the Conference Summary)

  • A statement that the parents have protection under the procedural safeguards (i.e.,

    Parent Rights) and if this is not an initial referral for evaluation, the means by which a

    copy of the Parent Rights can be obtained. 

    • Document 
  • Preschool Transition

  • For preschoolers transitioning from First Steps, an LEA representative

    participates in transition conferences arranged by First Steps (e.g., copy of

    Individual Family Service Plan [IFSP] or Conference Summary with LEA

    representative signature). 

  • For preschoolers transitioning from Part C, the IFSP was considered in 

    developing the IEP. 

    • Document 
  • Contents of the IEP

    Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
  • Review date: date by which the IEP will be reviewed by the ARC, within 365 days of the last IEP review date. 

  • 33 (a-h). The ARC considered the following in developing the IEP:

    The child’s present levels of academic achievement and functional 

    performance, including how the disability affects involvement and progress

    in the general curriculum (or for preschool, participation in appropriate

    activities).  The Present Levels includes a summary of information and

    data: 

  •  Communication Status;

  • Academic Performance;

  • Health/Vision/Hearing/Motor Abilities; 

  • Social and Emotional Status; 

  • General Intelligence 

  • Transition Needs (for children in 8th  grade or age 14 and older).

    NOTE:  There must be a minimum of one area (instruction; related

    service; community experience; development of employment and other

    post school adult living objectives; and if appropriate, acquisition of daily

    living skills and provision of a functional vocational evaluation) addressed; 

  • Functional Vision/Learning Media/Assessment; 

  • A summary statement, included in the Present Levels, of how the 

    child’s disability affects the child’s involvement and progress in the general

    curriculum 

    • Document 
  • Contents of the IEP

    Special Factors
  • 34 (a-f).   Consideration of Special Factors are completed for the following areas and are 

    consistent with the Present Levels:

    Mark "YES" if, for each special factor, the ARC has checked ‘yes’ and included the child’s 

    performance information within the Present Levels statement to support the special factor. 

    Mark “YES” if for each special factor, the ARC has checked ‘no’, and there is no information in 

    the Present Levels statement related to the special factor. 

    Mark “NO” if the ARC has checked ‘no’ to the special factor but information in the Present 

    Levels indicates that a special factor exists. 

  • Behavior; 

  • Limited English proficiency; 

  • Blind or visually impaired; 

  • Communication needs; 

  • Deaf or Hard of Hearing; 

  • Assistive technology needs. 

    • Document 
  • Contents of the IEP

    Annual Goals/SDI/Progress/SAS/Accomodations/Program Modifications/LRE/Related Services/ILP/ESY
  • Statement of measurable annual goals 

    Mark "YES" if annual goals relate directly to the present levels of academic achievement and

    functional performance and incorporate the general curriculum (i.e., Kentucky Core

    Assessment Standards; Program of Studies) to enable the child to be involved and make

    progress in the general curriculum, OR meets the child’s other educational needs that result

    from the disability; AND, 

    The annual goals are measurable and must include the (a) audience (student’s name), (b)

    behavior, (c) circumstances, (d) degree/criteria and (e) evaluation/method of measurement.

  • Statement of specially designed instruction

    SDI in its simplest form is "what the teacher does" to instruct, assess, and re-teach the child.

    The SDI documents what the teacher does, as appropriate, to adapt the content, to adapt the

    methodology, or to adapt the delivery of instruction.  If instruction is required for the child to

    use an assistive technology device, material, supplementary aid, strategy or service, it should

    be described as specially designed instruction on the IEP.

  • Statement of how the child’s progress toward annual goals will be measured 

    (method of measurement)

  • Statement of when the parent(s) will be regularly informed of progress 

    toward the goals

  •  Evidence of progress data collection and analysis for each annual goal 

  • Supplementary aids and services 

    Supplementary Aids and Services (SAS) in its simplest form is what the child needs in order to 

    advance appropriately toward attaining the goal(s) and be involved and make progress in the

    general curriculum, to participate in extracurricular  and other nonacademic activities, and be

    educated and participate with other children with and without disabilities. SAS includes strategies,

    aids, and services. 

    If the child requires specific materials, resources, aids, strategies or services to gain access

    to the general education curriculum, as supported in evaluation data, the IEP should describe

    them as supplementary aids and services based on peer-reviewed research to the extent practicable.

  • Statement of individual accommodations for participation in the state or 

    district-wide assessment

  • Statement of decisions and reasons for meeting the requirements for 

    Alternate Assessment Program

  • Statement of program modifications and supports for school personnel to be

    provided for the child to: 

    Advance appropriately toward attaining the annual goals;

    Be involved and progress in the general curriculum; 

    Participate in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities; and  

    Be educated and participate with other children with or without disabilities.

  •  An explanation of the extent, if any to which the student will not participate 

    with nondisabled children in regular education classes (content area).

  • 44. Special education services 

  • Anticipated frequency of service; 

  • Anticipated amount of time (duration); 

  • Projected beginning and ending dates; 

  • Anticipated location.

  • 45. Related services (if NA go to #46)

  • Anticipated frequency of service; 

  • Anticipated amount of time (duration); 

  • Projected beginning and ending dates; 

  • Anticipated location.

  • The ARC considers the concerns of the parent in the development of 

    the IEP.

  • For children in the 8th grade or age 14 and older, the child has a

    multi-year course of study as outlined in the child’s Individual Learning

    Plan.

  • The ARC considered extended school year (ESY) services according 

    to individual child need. 

    • Document 
  • Transition

    Notes for items 49a-49i: Complete this section for students who are 16 years of age or older.
  • Reminder: If on the day of review of the student’s record, the student is 16 years old – the transition requirements have to be met.  

    Mark "YES" if documentation includes postsecondary goals to cover two (2) areas, education/training and employment,

    and a third goal as needed for independent living.  Mark 49a "YES" only if 1 and 2 (and 3 if appropriate) are yes.  

    Postsecondary goals must be measurable and intended to occur after the student graduates from high school. 

  •  Mark 49a "YES" only if 49a1 and 49a2 (and 49a3 if appropriate) are yes.

  • The IEP includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals related to:

  • training or education 

  • employment

  • when appropriate, independent living skills. 

  • The IEP includes transition services that will reasonably enable the child to 

    reach the postsecondary goals.

  • For transition services likely to be provided or paid for by another agency, the 

    other agency is invited to send a representative, if appropriate.

    Mark "YES" if the Notice of Admissions and Release Committee Meeting indicates an outside agency that is likely

    to be responsible for providing or paying for transition services that are needed to assist the child in reaching

    postsecondary goals was invited to the meeting. 

    Mark "YES" if the ARC documented that the need for an outside agency was not appropriate or the child’s IEP

    did not include transition services that required another agency. 

    Outside agencies may include Office of Vocational Rehabilitation; Commission for Children with Special Health

    Care Needs; Department of Mental Health.  

    There may be transition services listed that involve another agency, but will not be implemented until the child’s

    senior year, this may be noted as an agency involved, but marked on the invitation that an invitation for the agency

    to send a representative to the ARC is not appropriate at this time.  

    The conference summary describes the decisions made in this process. For more information regarding transition

    requirements, see Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Requirements. 

  • If an agency was invited to send a representative signed Consent for Outside

    Agency Invitation is included.

    Mark "YES" if documentation includes a signed, dated parent(s) (or emancipated youth) Consent for Outside Agency Invitation

    obtained prior to the Notice of Admissions and Release Committee Meeting, if a representative of an outside agency that is

    likely to be responsible for providing or paying for transition services is invited to the ARC meeting.  

    Mark "YES" if Item 49c indicates that the ARC documented need for other agency was not appropriate or child’s IEP

    did not include transition services that required another agency.  

  • As a transition service, the child has a multi-year course of study as outlined in 

    the Individual Learning (Graduation) Plan.   

  • Annual goal(s) included in the IEP are related to the transition service needs.

  • Measurable postsecondary goals are based on age-appropriate transition 

    assessment.

  • The child is invited to the ARC meeting where transition services were discussed.

  • The measurable postsecondary goals are updated annually.

  • For students who have reached the age of 16 and older, all the Item 49 (a-i)

    requirements are met:    

  • By the student’s 16th  birthday, all of the requirements above are met. 

  • At least one year prior to the child reaching the age of majority, the IEP 

    includes a statement that the child and parent have been informed of the child’s

    rights and that the rights will transfer to the child upon reaching the age of

    majority. 

    • Document 
  • Placement/Timelines

  • The ARC considered potentially harmful effects of the placement on 

    the child or the quality of services.

  • Documentation shows that removal of the child from the regular 

    educational environment occurs only if education in the regular education

    environment with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be

    satisfactorily achieved due to the nature or severity of the disability.

    (Documentation shows that placement in regular class is the first

    placement option considered.) 

    Mark "NA" if placement was not an action proposed/refused during the ARC meeting.

  • For children initially referred during the current (reporting) school year, 

    the ARC completed the evaluation within 60 school days from receipt of

    Consent for Evaluation to the receipt of Consent for Services for children

    found eligible; 

    Or,  

    For ineligible students, 60 school days from receipt of Consent for

    Evaluation to date of Eligibility ARC.

  •  - -
  •  - -
  •  - -

  • For children initially referred during the current (reporting) school 

    year, the ARC developed the IEP within 30 calendar days from

    determining eligibility to developing the IEP.  

  •  - -
  •  - -
  • The ARC conducts a review of the IEP annually (i.e., within the 

    calendar year) to determine whether the annual goals for the child are

    being achieved and revise the IEP as appropriate.  Mark this item "NA" if

    child has been receiving special education less than one year.

  •  - -
  •  - -
  •  The ARC conducted a reevaluation in the current (reporting) year 

    (which may consist of review of existing data, if appropriate) within 3

    calendar years from the date of the last Eligibility ARC meeting.

  •  - -
  •  - -
  • For children exiting Part C, documentation shows that the IEP was 

    developed and implemented by the child’s third birthday. 

  •  - -
  •  - -
  • The IEP is in effect at the beginning of the school year.

  • For students graduating or aging out, documentation shows that the 

    child was provided a summary of the child’s academic achievement and

    functional performance including recommendations on how to assist the

    child in meeting postsecondary goals. 

    • Document 
  • Initial Evaluation and Reevaluation

  • The Referral Form is complete.

  • Documentation shows the child was provided:

    Appropriate, relevant research-based instruction and intervention services;

    Delivered in regular education settings;

    Delivered by qualified personnel; AND 

  • Documentation shows: 

    Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement and behavior 

    Collected and evaluated at reasonable intervals

    Documentation of correspondence to the parents 

  • The ARC identified a suspected disability and planned an appropriate 

    evaluation as documented on Consent to Evaluate/Reevaluate form.

    A review and analysis of the referral information (for initial evaluation)

    OR progress monitoring data of the child (for reevaluation); AND  

    the information was sufficient to support a suspected disability; AND 

    the tests and procedures necessary to assess the child were documented.   

  •  The ARC conducted a full and individual evaluation related to all areas of the 

    suspected disability. 

  • The ARC used a variety of assessment tools and procedures to determine the 

    child was a child with a disability and to determine an appropriate educational

    program for the child. 

  • The ARC provided and administered the assessment in the native language or 

    mode of communication appropriate for the child; OR documentation exists that it

    was clearly unfeasible to do so. 

  • The ARC considered evaluations and information provided by the 

    parents.

  • The ARC considered current classroom-based, local or state 

    assessments and classroom observations; and observations from

    teachers and related service providers. 

  •  The ARC conducted a full and individual evaluation prior to implementing 

    special education services. 

  • 69a(1-4).  If the ARC determines additional data is not needed for a

    reevaluation, the ARC documents the review of existing data:   

  • Evaluations and information provided by the parents; 

  • Minimum of two classroom-based observations by teachers and related services providers;

  • One or more of the following:

    Current classroom-based assessment data

    Local assessment data

    State assessment data 

  • Current progress monitoring of IEP goals to determine whether the child’s educational performance

    continues to be significantly and consistently below the level of similar age peers. (Adverse Effect) 

  • Notifies the parent(s) of the reasons the ARC is not conducting a reevaluation; AND 

    Informs parent(s) of their right to request an assessment.  

    • Document 
    • Should be Empty: